Ban on PFI : गैरकानूनी संस्था घोषित 5 साल के लिए प्रतिबंध, 8 सहयोगी संस्थाओं पर भी कार्रवाई
बंगाल मिरर, विशेष संवाददाता : देश विरोधी गतिविधियों में शामिल होने के आरोप में केंद्र सरकार ने 28 सितंबर को पॉपुलर फ्रंट ऑफ इंडिया (पीएफआई) और उसके सहयोगियों या सहयोगियों या मोर्चों को पांच साल की अवधि के लिए तत्काल प्रभाव से एक गैरकानूनी एसोसिएशन के रूप में घोषित किया। पीएफआई पर 5 साल के प्रतिबंध लगाने के साथ ही इसके 8 सहयोगी संस्थाओं पर यूएपीए के तहत कार्रवाई करते हुए उन पर भी 5 साल के लिए रोक लगा दी गई है
गैरकानूनी गतिविधियां (रोकथाम) अधिनियम, 1967 (1967 का 37) की धारा 3 की उप-धारा (1) द्वारा प्रदत्त शक्तियों का प्रयोग करते हुए, केंद्र सरकार ने एतद्द्वारा पॉपुलर फ्रंट ऑफ इंडिया (पीएफआई) और इसकी घोषणा की। रिहैब इंडिया फाउंडेशन, कैंपस फ्रंट ऑफ इंडिया, ऑल इंडिया इमाम काउंसिल, नेशनल कॉन्फेडरेशन ऑफ ह्यूमन राइट्स ऑर्गनाइजेशन, नेशनल विमेन फ्रंट, जूनियर फ्रंट, एम्पावर इंडिया फाउंडेशन और रिहैब फाउंडेशन, केरल सहित संबद्ध या सहयोगी या फ्रंट, एक ‘गैरकानूनी संघ’ के रूप में घोषित करते हुए इन पर 5 साल के लिए प्रतिबंध लगा दिया है।
पीएफआई के देश विरोधी गतिविधियों में शामिल होने की आशंकाएं के चलते पिछले कई दिनों से सरकारी एजेंसियों ने संस्था पर नकेल कसी हुई थी। ईडी और एनआईए ने देश भर में संस्था के तमाम ठिकानों पर छापे मारे, जिसको लेकर बड़े स्तर पर विरोध भी देखने को मिला। मंगलवार को भी सरकार की पीएफआई के खिलाफ कार्रवाई जारी रही। कल सात राज्यों में स्थानीय पुलिस और आतंकरोधी दस्ते ने पीएफआइ से जुड़े ठिकानों पर छापा मारा और इससे जुड़े 170 से अधिक लोगों को हिरासत में लिया। पूछताछ के बाद इनमें से कई को गिरफ्तार भी किया गया है। इससे पहले गुरुवार को एनआइए के नेतृत्व में 15 राज्यों में 93 स्थानों पर छापेमारी हुई थी।
HOW CAN ANY “REAL MUSLIM” ACCEPT HINDOOISM AS A RELIGION OR RAMA AS A GOD ?
SO LONG AS HINDOOS EXIST – PFI WILL THRIVE! BAN WILL MAKE THEM BETTER AND INNOVATIVE
Rama the Iblis – PART 1
As per the Valmiki Ramayana – Rama was an impotent gay pansy,a coward, a man who pimped his wife, an impotentica, a murderer and a man who was born out of bestiality !dindooohindoo
Case 1 – Sita called Rama an Impotent Pansy
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya Chapter[Sarga] 30
किम् त्वा अमन्यत वैदेहः पिता मे मिथिला अधिपः | राम जामातरम् प्राप्य स्त्रियम् पुरुष विग्रहम् || २-३०-३
“What my father, the king of Mithila belonging to the country of Videha, think of himself having got as so-in-law you, a woman having the form of a man?”
Case 2 – Rama told Sita to whore herself to o demons and apes- this is in the Valmiki Ramayana
Chapter [Sarga] 115
तदद्य व्याहृतं भद्रे मयैतत् कृतबुद्धिना |
लक्ष्मणे वाथ भरते कुरु बुद्धिं यथासुखम् || ६-११५-२
“O gracious lady! Therefore, this has been spoken by me today, with a resolved mind. Set you mind on Lakshmana or Bharata, as per your ease.”
“O Seetha! Otherwise, set your mind either on Shatrughna or on Sugreeva or on Vibhishana the demon; or according to your own comfort.”\
Case 3 – Rama killed a Sudra to save the son of a Brahmin ! Also because the Sudra was studying the Vedas
Book 7, the ‘Uttarakanda’ [Final Chapter], sargas 73-76, in the Adhyatma Ramayana version of Ramayana.
When Rama is reigning as a virtuous king, a humble aged Brahmin comes to him, weeping, with his dead son in his arms. He says that Rama must have committed some sin, or else his son would not have died.
(74) The sage Narada explains to Rama that a Shudra is practicing penances, and this is the cause of the child’s death.
(75) Rama goes on a tour of inspection in his flying chariot, and finds an ascetic doing austerities, and asks who he is. ”
(76) Hearing the [inquiring] words of Rama of imperishable exploits, that ascetic, his head still hanging downwards [as part of his austerities] answered:— ‘O Rama, I was born of a Shudra alliance and I am performing this rigorous penance in order to Conquer the heavens with this body. Lord Rama killed him due to his bad intentions and there by giving Shambuka his Moksha.
Case 4- Rama;s mother had sex with a Horse !
Book I : Bala Kanda – The Youthful Majesties
Chapter [Sarga] 14
Queen Kausalya desiring the results of ritual disconcertedly resided one night with that horse that flew away like a bird. [1-14-34]
Case 5 – Was Rama a Monkey ?
Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War
Chapter [Sarga] 128
आजानुलम्बिबाहुश्च महास्कन्धः प्रतापवान् |
लक्ष्मणानुचरो रामः पृथिवीमन्वपालयत् || ६-१२८-९७
That Rama, having his long arms reaching down his knees, having a broad chest and glorious, ruled this earth with Lakshmana as his companion.
No humans has arms reaching to the knees ! Is Rama an Ape ?
Ramayana says that Rama had hands till his knees, and that explains his love and fondness for all apes and monkeys
Case 6
WAS RAMA A GAY APE ? THIS IS HANOOMAN DESCRIBING THE NAKED BODY OF RAMA TO SITA
Book V : Sundara Kanda – Book Of Beauty
Chapter [Sarga] 35
18.
“He has three folds in the skin of his neck and belly. He is depressed at three places (viz. the middle of his soles, the lines on his soles and the nipples).
He is undersized at four places (viz. the neck, membran virile, the back and the shanks). He is endowed with three spirals in the hair of his head.
NOTE THE UNDERSIZED MEMBRANE VIRILE ! HOW DID HANOOMAN HAVE SUCH INTICATE KNOW HOW OF RAMAS NAKED BODY – UNLESS……..
Rama spent 12 years with Lakshmana and Apes, with no woman – so he became Gay –so what – it is all evolution
Case 7 –Rama ate rats and lizards
Book IV : Kishkindha Kanda – Chapter 17
पंच पंच नखा भक्ष्या ब्रह्म क्षत्रेण राघव |
शल्यकः श्वाविधो गोधा शशः कूर्मः च पंचमः || १-१७-३९
“Raghava, five kinds of five-nailed animals, viz., a kind of wild rodent, a kind of wild-boar, a kind of lizard, a hare and fifthly the turtle are edible for Brahmans and Kshatriya-s. [4-17-39] !
Case 8 – Rama was a Cowards,weasel and a treacherous rat
NOTE THESE WORDS OF VALI
Rama – The Snake
Vali was a fool in Trusting Rama,the weasel and a coward – which he realised,AFTER he was shot IN THE BACK .Vali calls Rama a Snake
\प्रसुप्तः पन्नगेन इव नरः पाप वशम् गतः || १-१७-४८
“An unassailable one, such as I am, I am killed by you while you remained invisible on the field of fight, as with a sinner bitten by a snake while he is asleep. [4-17-48]
Rama – The Weasel
Vali also says that had Rama fought with him face to face – Vali would have killed him ! (like what Pakistanis say about the Indians)
दृश्यमानः तु युध्येथा मया युधि नृपात्मज |
अद्य वैवस्वतम् देवम् पश्येः त्वम् निहतो मया || १-१७-४७
“Had you been in combat with me en face oh, prince, you would have been killed by me and by now you would have seen the death-god Yama. [4-17-47]
Rama – The Impotent Coward
Vali also said that he would have brought Ravana by the scruff of his neck – which Rama could not do for 2 decades (akin to ISI picking up Jadhav from Iran)
“For which purpose I am killed, intending to do good to Sugreeva is incidental to it, you should have assigned me for that purpose in the first instance itself, and I would have brought that evil-minded demon Ravana, the abductor of your wife in one day, that too without killing him in any fight, but by fastening him by neck,and I would have presented Maithili to you. [3-17-49, 50]
What was life in the days of Rama the Limpdick ?
It was aine,venison,massage girls and orgiees,as per the Ramayana.dindooohindoo
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 52
सुराघटसहस्रेण मांसभूतोदनेन च |
यक्ष्ये त्वाम् प्रयता देवि पुरीम् पुनरुपागता || २-५२-८९
Verse 89.
“Oh, goddess! After reaching back the city of Ayodhya, I shall worship you with thousand pots of spirituous liquor and jellied meat with cooked rice well prepared for the solemn rite.”
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 91
अन्याः स्रवन्तु मैरेयम् सुराम् अन्याः सुनिष्ठिताम् |
अपराः च उदकम् शीतम् इक्षु काण्ड रस उपमम् || २-९१-१५
Verse 15.
“Let some rivers flow with Maireya ( a kind of wine made from date palms etc) some others flow with highly refined spirituous liquor and some others flow with cool water with a taste of sugarcane.”
सुराम् सुरापाः पिबत पायसम् च बुभुक्षिताः || २-९१-५२
मांसनि च सुमेध्यानि भक्ष्यन्ताम् यावद् इग्च्छथ || २-९१-५३
Verse 52; 53.
“O, wine-bibbers! Drink the wine, however much you desire! O troops stricken with hunger! Let milk thickened iwth rice and the meats which are very much fresh, be eaten (as you will)”
उत्साद्य स्नापयन्ति स्म नदी तीरेषु वल्गुषु |
अप्य् एकम् एकम् पुरुषम् प्रमदाः सत्प च अष्ट च || २-९१-५४
Verse 54.
Seven or eight young women bathed every single man on the beautiful river-banks, after massaging their body with oil.
सम्वहन्त्यः समापेतुर् नार्यो रुचिर लोचनाः |
परिमृज्य तथा न्यायम् पाययन्ति वर अन्गनाः || २-९१-५५
Verse 55.
Women with charming eyes came running and shampooed their limbs. Lovely women likewise wiped off the moisture on their body with towels and gave them beverages to drink, mutually sharing them among each other.
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 96
तां तथा दर्शयित्वा तु मैथिलीं गिरिनिम्नगाम् |
निषसाद गिरिप्रस्थे सीतां मांसेन चन्दयन् || २-९६-१
Vere 1.
Having shown Mandakini River in that manner to Seetha, the daughter of Mithila, Rama set on the hill-side in order to gratify her appetite with a piece of flesh.
इदं मेध्यमिदं स्वादु निष्टप्तमिदमग्निना |
एवमास्ते स धर्मात्मा सीतया सह राघवः || २-९६-२
Verse 2.
Rama, whose mind was devoted to righteousness stayed there with Seetha, saying; “This meat is fresh, this is savoury and roasted in the fire.”
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 56
ऐणेयम् मांसम् आहृत्य शालाम् यक्ष्यामहे वयम् |
कर्त्व्यम् वास्तुशमनम् सौमित्रे चिरजीवभिः || २-५६-२२
Verse 22.
“Oh, Lakshmana! Bring the meat of an antelope. We shall perform a purifactory ceremony while entering the house. Which is to be done by those who wish to live long.”
मृगम् हत्वाऽऽनय क्षिप्रम् लक्ष्मणेह शुभेक्षण
कर्तव्यः शास्त्रदृष्टो हि विधिर्दर्ममनुस्मर || २-५६-२३
Verse 23.
“Oh, large-eyed Lakshmana! Killing the antelope quickly, bring it here. The prescribed rite according to scriptural point of view indeed is to be performed. Keep in mind the sacred obligation.”
How was Kaushalya the mother of Rama,whose father is unknown,treated by her husband ?
It reflects the state of the hindooo woman from time immemorial.She says that her husband treated her worse than all his wives and their servants ! She also says that Rama gave her no joy or happiness or satisfaction.dindooohindoo
Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter 20
न द्ऱ्ष्ट पूर्वम् कल्याणम् सुखम् वा पति पौरुषे |
अपि पुत्रे विपश्येयम् इति राम आस्थितम् मया || २-२०-३८
Verse 38.
“Oh, Rama! I have not seen any happiness or prosperity earlier, while my husband is in power. I believed that I could see them at last when my son comes to power.”
सा बहूनि अमनोज्ञानि वाक्यानि ह्ऱ्दयच्चिदाम् |
अहम् श्रोष्ये सपत्नीनाम् अवराणाम् वरा सती || २-२०-३९
Verse 39.
“I have to hear so many disagreeable words from my fellow-wives who are inferior to me and who pierce my heart with their words though I am a better and virtuous wife among them.”
अत्यन्तनिगृहीतास्मि भर्तुर्नित्य्मतन्त्रिता |
परिवारेण कैकेय्या समा वाप्यथवाऽवरा || २-२०-४२
Verse 42.
“My husband always held me down, without giving me any independence and treat me equal to or even lower than the servants of Kaikeyi”
यदि पुत्र न जायेथा मम शोकाय राघव |
न स्म दुह्खम् अतः भूयः पश्येयम् अहम् अप्रजा || २-२०-३६
Verse 36.
“Oh, Rama! I would not have felt this much grief if I were childless .You are born only to produce sorrow to me.”